Leadership Share Incentivisation in an EOT business

View of the Houses of Parliament and Big Ben across the River Thames on a clear day

Implementing a Share Option Scheme for Leadership in an Employee-Owned Company

As an employee-owned company operating under an Employee Ownership Trust (EOT) structure, implementing a share option scheme for leadership requires careful consideration. This document outlines the potential benefits and challenges, with a particular focus on compliance with EOT requirements, the impact on leadership incentives, and the potential consequences for the Trust and its beneficiaries.


Potential Benefits of a Share Option Scheme for Leadership

  1. Retention and Motivation
    • Share options serve as a powerful retention tool, incentivizing leadership to remain with the business.
    • Aligns leadership’s financial interests with long-term company growth and success.
  2. Performance Incentives
    • Leadership members with share options have a vested interest in increasing company value, encouraging strategic decision-making that enhances profitability.
  3. Market-Competitive Compensation
    • A share option scheme can offer an attractive financial package without requiring immediate cash outlay, making leadership remuneration more competitive.
  4. Flexibility in Structuring Awards
    • Vesting conditions (e.g., time-based or performance-based vesting) can be used to ensure commitment to long-term goals.
  5. Delayed Dilution of EOT Ownership
    • Unlike immediate share grants, options do not immediately impact the EOT’s majority shareholding until they are exercised.

Challenges and Considerations

  1. Impact on Employee Ownership Culture
    • Introducing a share option scheme for leadership could create a perception of inequality, undermining the principles of broad-based employee ownership.
    • Ensuring that leadership remains committed to the EOT’s mission, rather than personal financial gains, is essential.
  2. Compliance with EOT Rules and the Excluded Participator Status
    • Under Section 236J of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992, an Excluded Participator is anyone who, within 10 years before the EOT acquisition, held (or had options over) at least 5% of any share class.
    • If leadership members already qualify as Excluded Participators, receiving share options does not affect their ability to receive tax-free profit-sharing bonuses under Section 312A – 312I of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003.
    • However, an Excluded Participator cannot receive capital distributions from the EOT, such as in the event of a Trust wind-up.
    • Additionally, individuals who acquire 5% or more of any class of shares after the EOT is established would become Excluded Participators from that point forward, impacting their participation in certain EOT benefits.
    • The rules apply to any class of shares, meaning that even minority share classes, such as non-voting or preference shares, count toward the 5% threshold, potentially leading to unintended disqualifications.
    • Structuring the scheme to avoid turning leadership members into Excluded Participators may be necessary to preserve full participation in EOT benefits.
  3. Risk to the EOT’s Majority Ownership
    • Share Options risk a dilution of the EOT below majority ownership – this must be considered carefully to ensure that all options, if exercised, would not cause this threshold to be breached.
    • Limited Participation Requirement requires that the number of employees holding 5% or more of any share class (including connected persons) must not exceed 40% of the total workforce.
    • If share options lead to a concentration of ownership among a small leadership group, the EOT risks breaching this threshold, potentially triggering a disqualifying event.
  4. Valuation and Liquidity Issues
    • Leadership shareholders may require a liquidity event (such as a sale) to realize their share value, which could create pressure to sell the business before the EOT has delivered long-term benefits to employees.
    • If there is no such event, the Company and/or the EOT will need to consider how shares would purchased from departing shareholders. This could cause significant cash flow issues for the Company, limiting reinvestment and bonuses.
  5. Potential Reduction in Employee Profit Share
    • If leadership shareholders receive dividends, this could reduce the profits available for distribution under the EOT profit-sharing scheme.
    • Ensuring fairness between leadership incentives and broader employee benefits is key to maintaining trust and engagement.
  6. Taxation and Financial Complexity
    • The exercise of share options could trigger Capital Gains Tax (CGT) liabilities for leadership members.
    • If structured as an Enterprise Management Incentive (EMI) scheme, the tax burden may be mitigated, but strict HMRC compliance is required.

Leadership Issues and Unintended Consequences

  1. Conflicts of Interest
    • Leadership with significant shareholding may push for strategies that maximize personal returns rather than those aligned with the EOT’s long-term goals.
    • Trustees must ensure that any scheme does not compromise their fiduciary duty to the employee beneficiaries.
  2. Pressure for a Sale or Buyout
    • Option holders may advocate for a sale to realize share value, potentially leading to an exit that does not serve the best interests of employees.
  3. Governance and Control Risks
    • If share options create a leadership group with significant voting power, it may erode the EOT’s ability to make independent decisions in line with its objectives.

Conclusion and Recommendations

While a share option scheme can be a useful tool for leadership retention and motivation, it poses significant risks to the integrity of the employee-owned model. Any such scheme should be carefully structured to:

  • Avoid excessive concentration of ownership to protect EOT majority control.
  • Ensure alignment with EOT principles to maintain fairness across all employees.
  • Consider alternative incentives, such as enhanced profit-sharing mechanisms for leadership.
  • Take legal and tax advice to ensure compliance with EOT rules and prevent disqualifying events.

For a tailored approach that balances leadership incentives with the long-term sustainability of employee ownership, alternative incentive structures should also be explored.

Schedule a call

We’re here to help and support you in any way we can. Do not hesitate to reach out for any inquiries, feedback, or assistance you may need.

Smiling middle-aged man with beard holding glasses seated on patterned couch indoors